The relationship between mass, weight and gravity from the point of view of the electron
It is fascinating that gravity at the atomic scale could be responsible for the mass of the atom, if we assume that electrons get closer together when there are more electrons in an atom. The more electrons in a nucleus would result in a closer packing of the electrons and you would also need a greater number of electrons around the outside of the nucleus in order to hold the electrons in the nucleus in place.
I have tried to calculate the radius of the nucleus based on the number of the electrons in the nucleus. I must admit this is not easy but I have developed a model that I have tried to use. What would be good would be someone who has good mathematical skills and can calculate areas of wave-functions based on super symmetry at each point location in the geometry of the electron orbital at the various electron levels. This may have already been done. I have not looked at this stage. However, I have seen the various orbital shapes and therefore could potentially do this based on geometry. The caluclations need to be performed at the Plank length to determine each and every point in the geometry. Therefore, each position is determined in space-time from the point of view of the electron travelling at the speed of light which means it is in all positions but when you make the observation or the measurement it is only at one position because you have taken time to send the signal, obtain the measurement, obtain the photons into the eye, capture the signal into an electrical current via signal transduction, process the information in the brain and then reconstruct the thought process to determine what it is that you are observing based on part knowledge and observation. So consciousness is too slow to see what is happening in real time. Your biology is too poor to understand what is happening in real time. Therefore we have used probability to overcome these issues. However, without your observation the system is in harmony and has super symmetry and therefore equals zero.The cancelation of positives and negatives and the normal distribution and the isoelectric point of the system is obtained, which corresponds to the minimized energy state. So all your calculations of the positioning in super symmetry need to equal zero and not 1 as in the probability wave function. This is how our minds transition from the quantum world to the physical world and why things remain where they are located because the observation confirms the belief. As there is only one orientation that provides symmetry once the first position has been identified (0,0,0) (x,y,z).
Look at the radius of the electron in the nucleus based on the wavelength e.g. gamma rays and how that relates to distance between electrons in the nucleus and see if those frequencies can be attributed to a distance of r that corresponds to an increased gravitational field within the nucleus. I believe there is a relationship but you need to understand the structure of the orbitals in order to calculate the correct geometry of the field. This is beyond me at present, but it is OK for the spherical inner electron shell of 1s2 orbital. I did find a satisfactory relationship between proximity of the electrons in the nucleus and the gravitational field strength. So I was pleased with the calculations.
I intend to publish this information in due course but am on a roll and having to combat ignorance from many people to keep myself safe.
r = sqrt G.(e^n / 4 Pi r^2) where the radius r^2 is a sphere.
So the assumption was based on the diameter of the electron (Plank length) and then I added three electrions together for the proton and neutron. I added an extra electron for the neutron due to the neutralisation fo the charge on the neutron based on my model.
Then H(1:1) = electron + a proton
Then I walked up the periodic table trying to keep in mind symmetry and building the orbitals slowly layer upon layer. I am sure someone could do a better job but that will come with time.
These are approximate radius between electrons. We could work backward based on known masses and then calculate the radius between electrons using the gravitional constant but someone else can do that.
My ideas have been used to do chromatography in a completely new way using CCAEC and conformational chromatography being able to separate the same protein based on its ability to contain a single divalent cation, or the presence of a fatty acid in BSA, which results in charge neutralization. This is a revolutionary approach to perform chromatography and one that can be exploited to perform analytical or industrial protein separations.
This is part of the quantum revolution that is currently underway which is changing everything by being able to identify new low energy states in complex biological systems.
Being able to identify conditions that separate proteins on the basis of 0.1 pH unit with their isoelectric point using ion exchange rather than chromatofocusing and doing so cheaply provides a greater level of control in processing products for industrial use.
I have fractionated lacoferrin lactoferrin using CCAEC and conformational chromatography into holo lactoferrin and apolactoferrin. Next I would like to separate into the various iron forms so that complete analytical evaluation can be performed for the various forms of lactoferrin.
I have separated the BSA which is fatty acid free from lipid bound BSA. This was performed using CCAEC.
I have separated all the Whey proteins using CCAEC.
This appears to be an effective approach to target one protein at a time for isolation. Once optimization is performed it has a remarkable selectivity to purify the target of interest.